Over the weekend I listened to yet another great podcast from The RSA.
Clay Shirky presented on the topic of a ‘cognitive surplus’ for his book Here Comes Everybody: The Power of Organising without Organisations. He said that approx100million hours has been invested in the creation of Wikipedia. By contrast, there are trillions of global hours available within ’surplus’ every year. The premise for the presentation was that humans are generous creatures and that new technology presents huge potential for altruistic, collaborative behaviour that delivers a greater good.
This idea is the basis for many aspects of the Social Web (for want of a better term, as this is broader than social media). The notion that efficient networks without geographic boundaries will act as the vehicle for human endeavour in the pursuit of positive economic, creative and educational outcomes has great appeal.
The idea of a cognitive surplus is also fascinating in the context of widespread budget deficits but don’t expect any major policy announcements from Gillard or Abbott on this topic just yet!
The presentation got me thinking about the question of a political culture within the realm of the Social Web. If Social is about sharing, co-operation and contributing to community then is it safe to assume that a left leaning political culture underpins the ‘movement’?
Is it important for the community to acknowledge in some capacity the presence of a common political ethos within the Social Web or the perhaps to acknowledge the lack of one? Does the Social Web transcend traditional notions of political affiliation or realisation? Are creativity and collaboration apolitical forces in 2010?
Most importantly, can our positive vision of a Social good delivered by technology and the Web be achieved without a political consensus?
Two years ago I sought professional help in order to overcome my chronic personal procrastination. I worked with a life coach who helped me develop strategies for setting personals goals and achieving them.
