Criticism towards the actions of big business will ultimately lead to a well used defence:
“They have to protect the fudiciary interests of shareholders.”
The implication is – “we’re protecting you”. But you hardly need to scratch the surface of this argument to see it for what it is.
Shareholders/stakeholders aren’t enriched in equal measure.
Often the actions of big business have a negative impact on the wider community/environment/future that far outweighs my dividend return as a shareholder.
And has anyone noticed that share markets are in freefall or at best out-of-control-volatile?
The duty of big business should be to protect everyone’s interests (present and future), not just vested interests.
And as global issues such as climate change, famine, civil unrest and resource shortages demonstrate we’re all shareholders at the end of the day.
*** Update *** Interesting conversation here around the concentration of wealth, which has resulted in the US becoming a centrally planned economy.
Tags: business, ethics, markets, shareholders, shares
