<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Just Another 24 Hours &#187; data</title>
	<atom:link href="http://justanother24hours.com/tag/data/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://justanother24hours.com</link>
	<description>By Daniel Young</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 13:01:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<cloud domain='justanother24hours.com' port='80' path='/?rsscloud=notify' registerProcedure='' protocol='http-post' />
		<item>
		<title>The Facebook Irony: Recent Facebook outrage and privacy debate doesn&#8217;t ring true</title>
		<link>http://justanother24hours.com/social-media/the-facebook-irony-recent-facebook-outrage-and-privacy-debate-doesnt-ring-true/</link>
		<comments>http://justanother24hours.com/social-media/the-facebook-irony-recent-facebook-outrage-and-privacy-debate-doesnt-ring-true/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Jun 2010 05:37:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Daniel Young</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Social media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[data]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[facebook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[information]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[irony]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Likes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SocialNetworks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[User]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Zuckerberg]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://justanother24hours.com/?p=1161</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Facebook privacy issues and attacks on Mark Zuckerberg are ironic given the fact that user data and member information supports the business model of Facebook and other social networks]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: justify;"><img class="alignleft size-thumbnail wp-image-1163" style="border: 2px solid black; margin-left: 10px; margin-right: 10px;" title="shocked-woman_aa039975" src="http://justanother24hours.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/06/shocked-woman_aa039975-169x169-custom.jpg" alt="shocked-woman_aa039975" width="169" height="169" />On the topic of recent Facebook &#8216;outrage&#8217; around privacy issues.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">A significant section of the media/Web commentariat has expressed its dis-satisfiaction with Facebook&#8217;s policies and management. I can&#8217;t help noticing the irony here.<span id="more-1161"></span></p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">Individuals who have built businesses and reputations on the basis of  the models that  underpin social media and digital advertising are now outraged at the fact that  Facebook wants to make money from user data.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">Really?</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">These people have the right to express a view, and Facebook has not managed its stakeholders well.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">But&#8230;</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">The issue here is that Facebook wants to access, use and profit from information about its members.  Shock! Horror!</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">The opportunity to do both of these things is why Facebook and other services like it exist in the first place!</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">Many seem to think that Mark Zuckerberg provides Facebook as a service out of the goodness of his heart. This sense of entitlement makes us the &#8216;dumb f*cks&#8217;.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;"><img class="size-thumbnail  wp-image-1162 alignright" style="border: 1px solid black;  margin-left: 10px;  margin-right: 10px;" title="mark-zuckerberg1" src="http://justanother24hours.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/06/mark-zuckerberg1-150x150.jpg" alt="mark-zuckerberg1" width="150" height="150" /></p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">Others seem to think that they can re-define the terms of their usage after they agreed to an End User License Agreement, which handed control of their content and data to Facebook.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">User data underpins the business model.  What was once considered private information will become more public.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">You have a choice.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://justanother24hours.com/social-media/the-facebook-irony-recent-facebook-outrage-and-privacy-debate-doesnt-ring-true/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Great Tool: Forester Technographics Profiling</title>
		<link>http://justanother24hours.com/blogging/great-tool-forester-technographics-profiling/</link>
		<comments>http://justanother24hours.com/blogging/great-tool-forester-technographics-profiling/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 01:00:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Daniel Young</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blogging]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Audience]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Consumption]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[data]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Forrester]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[online]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Segmentation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technographics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://justanother24hours.com/?p=1013</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Forrester Technographics ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><iframe height="360" frameborder="0" width="510" scrolling="no" marginwidth="0" marginheight="0" src="http://www.forrester.com/groundswell/b2c_profile_tool/b2c"> </iframe></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://justanother24hours.com/blogging/great-tool-forester-technographics-profiling/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Revenue streams for Twitter &#8211; Will Google and Microsoft provide an answer</title>
		<link>http://justanother24hours.com/social-media/revenue-streams-for-twitter-will-google-and-microsoft-provide-an-answer/</link>
		<comments>http://justanother24hours.com/social-media/revenue-streams-for-twitter-will-google-and-microsoft-provide-an-answer/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2009 02:05:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Daniel Young</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Social media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[data]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mining]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[realtime]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Search]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[twitter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Web]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://justanother24hours.com/?p=922</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Twitter would gain added legitimacy if it were added as a Vertical Search option in Google alongisde Images, News, Blogs, Maps etc.  Ultimately, Google and Microsoft are attempting to improve their access to the worldwide Web and extend the usefulness and reach of their search engines. For more on the Real-Time Web check this post by ReadWriteWeb.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: justify;">Twitter is in advanced talks with Google and Microsoft to provide them with access to its data, according to a report in <a title="All Things Digital Twitter data mining deals " href="http://kara.allthingsd.com/20091008/twitter-talking-separately-to-microsoft-and-also-google-about-big-data-mining-deals/" target="_blank">All Things Digital</a>.  If successful, this would provide Twitter with a sizeable revenue stream, which would prevent it having to clutter the interface or alienate users by introducing advertising.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">On the other hand, Twitter needs to be sensitive to perceptions around privacy of information.  Twitter uses may not be entirely comfortable with Twitter selling information about their preferences, interests, habits etc. to third parties &#8211; particularly to Microsoft and/or Google.   </p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">Twitter would gain added legitimacy if it were added as a Vertical Search option in Google alongisde Images, News, Blogs, Maps etc.  Ultimately, Google and Microsoft are attempting to improve their access to the worldwide Web and extend the usefulness and reach of their search engines. For more on the Real-Time Web check this post by <a title="ReadWriteWeb on the Real Time Web" href="http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/ten_useful_examples_of_the_real-time_web_in_action.php" target="_blank">ReadWriteWeb</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://justanother24hours.com/social-media/revenue-streams-for-twitter-will-google-and-microsoft-provide-an-answer/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Books as back-up?</title>
		<link>http://justanother24hours.com/technology/books-as-back-up/</link>
		<comments>http://justanother24hours.com/technology/books-as-back-up/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Apr 2008 00:36:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Daniel Young</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[data]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[degradation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://justanother24hours.com/technology/books-as-back-up/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Interesting article from the NYT on data degradation. I hadn&#8217;t heard of this issue before and part of me suspects that it may just be a money spinner for the technology industry. My guess would be that data degrades very slowly but platform and hardware obsolesence is obviously a real issue.  
It gives rise to a [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting article from the NYT on <a target="_blank" href="http://www.nytimes.com/2008/04/09/technology/techspecial/09store.html?ref=techspecial" title="Data degradation article from the NYT">data degradation</a>. I hadn&#8217;t heard of this issue before and part of me suspects that it may just be a money spinner for the technology industry. My guess would be that data degrades very slowly but platform and hardware obsolesence is obviously a real issue.  </p>
<p>It gives rise to a question that I have pondered for some time: How much does data weigh?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://justanother24hours.com/technology/books-as-back-up/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 1.497 seconds -->
