Posts Tagged ‘facebook’

One in Four Prefer the Old Facebook

September 23rd, 2008 by Daniel Young | 1 Comment | Filed in Social media, Technology

What do you think of the new Facebook design?

My first impression of the new new design was that it felt more like an enterprise application. I think the tabs have added a sense – imagined or real – of complexity.

I don’t understand the justification from moving from the one profile page to the tabbed format. A service which made a huge amount of information and interaction readily available has become much more cumbersome to use.

With the old version, you didn’t know what was new, but by scrolling down the page – the new content was revealed to you. Now users must click on tabs and literally find content and updates – it’s much less fun and much more effort.

Facebook won’t be supporting the two versions, unlike Yahoo!, for example, which continues to support ‘Classic’ and ‘New’ Yahoo! Mail. This is despite the fact that 1 in 4 users prefer the old design (Facebook data).

The Inside Facebook blog is a great source of info on – you guessed it – Facebook.

People have an emotional connection with Facebook and they tend to be resistant to change in general so it’s inevitable that there would be a kick back to the re-design.

This Facebook group ‘1 000 000+ to bring back old facebook’ has 369,810 members.

Tags: , , , ,

YouAre overwhelmed by social networks

July 16th, 2008 by Daniel Young | No Comments | Filed in Blogging, Social media, Technology

I recently blogged on the plethora of social networks. In recent weeks, there has been lots of chat about the threat that FriendFeed poses to the Twitter community and many high profile bloggers have moved from Tweeting to FriendFeed.

I feel that FriendFeed represents a big threat to Twitter.

I found out today about the launch of a new network; ’YouAre’ from Spain. I applied for beta access today. 

This is a micro-blogging platform with aspects of LinkedIN, del.icio.us and others combined with a secret sauce, which hasn’t been revealed as yet. Screenshots available here.  

I am keen to trial the new service and will cover it here. I have been told that my access will come through in a few weeks.

The beauty and irony of the social networking is that I found out about YouAre on FriendFeed via Duncan Riley’s post. That would be like the Sun newspaper in Britain running a story on the launch of the Today newspaper and suggesting I check it out or me placing a classified ad in the window of my local newsagents suggesting that passers by check out the newsagency down the road. 

Consolidation in this space is inevitable. We’ve seen it in most industry sectors, take the ERP market in recent years. Most industries mature before they consolidate but the social networking sector will get there much more quickly surely.

The issue of monetization is one spanner in the works still.

Tags: , , , , , ,

Journalists and blogging

June 17th, 2008 by Daniel Young | 1 Comment | Filed in Blogging, Public Relations, Social media, Technology

The Media, Entertainment & Arts Alliance (MEAA) put on event tonight entitled ‘Freelance Journalists and Blogging’. Laurel Papworth spoke on the topic in the glamorous surrounds of the Orient Hotel in the Rocks, Sydney.

 Orient Hotel

Papworth’s presentation provided an overview of well known social networking sites and blogging platforms and instructions on how bloggers and content creators can promote their product via social media. It dealt with some of the implications for the freelance journalist community.

The content was relatively rudimentary but well matched to the level of knowledge and experience among the audience of freelance writers.

I have seen Papworth speak a few times. Tonight, I again learnt about some new stuff, fact and figures:

  • The biggest concern for 50% of the journalists that participated in a PEW survey (State of the News Media) ranked economic concerns as their biggest professional issue  
  • MySpace = the third largest country in the world
  • More on corporate activity within Facebook: Salesforce has created an application that links Facebook activity with its CRM application. More on this here.
  • Glassdoor: A site that provides an environment for employees to anonymously rate their employer. More from Ms. Papworth here.

Editor 

The take away was basically: Freelances need to get theirs head around social media and learn how to use it to their advantage because in the future an editor is just as likely to commission a blogger with a ready made audience and some degree of authority on a specific topic.

I don’t think there is any doubt that this is true.

The evening got me thinking about journalism and how this compares to blogging. Surely good journalism is mainly but not totally about objectivity, as defined by Yahoo! Education:

The style of writing characteristic of material in newspapers and magazines, consisting of direct presentation of facts or occurrences with little attempt at analysis or interpretation.  

Clearly, journalists and publishers have biases and political leanings but famous papers got that way because they were objective. The skill in journalism comes from researching and understanding an issue before gathering credible sources together to present a balanced analysis of that topic.   

Bloggers have an agenda. They shoot from the hip and more often than not they promote themselves and their point of view. There is no requirement for objectivity. They know that their audience either already has an interest in their favoured topic or agrees with them or just finds their personal going-ons interesting. 

They operate within echo chambers (at least to some extent) and their success and the degree to which they entertain and inform is rarely determined by their ability to deconstruct relevant and topical issues.

This begs the question: Is it better to have an understanding of what’s going on or to know what somebody else thinks?

A combination of Opinion and Objectivity would be ideal but as Papworth said during her concluding comment the US newspapers are placing more and more blog content on their home pages and she expects this trend to be repeated in Australia.   

The last questioner of the night pondered the issue of time; where might freelance writers find time to blog and manage and extend their social networks? A valid question because now it’s my bedtime.

You’ll find the presentation from tonight’s event here (soon).

Tags: , , , , , , , , , ,

This digital life*

April 9th, 2008 by Daniel Young | No Comments | Filed in Life, Social media, Technology

I signed up for Twitter today and added the app to my blog, which you can see in the top left hand corner. I then added the Twitter application to Facebook and Plaxo and registered my phone for SMS updates. I sent a few ‘tweets’ (a slightly cringe worthy term) out and added some contacts that I know, and know of, as people that I will follow. The ‘know ofs’ included Robert Scoble and Steve Rubel. I downloaded twhril – a Twitter desktop client. I added my LinkedIn profile to my Twitter account and synced Facebook and LinkedIn with Plaxo. I sent my first mobile tweet from Mansions Hotel in Kings Cross while I ate my tea. It was the poker night. I had mushroom sauce. I tried to add a Google Map to this post – doesn’t seem to be working. I learnt about tinyURL.

I watched a bit of TV and saw Richard Branson talking about the environment. He said that all Virgin Atlantic profits for the next ten years would be invested in research into clean fuels. I did a Google search but couldn’t find anything on this – did he just announce it? Surely not. Not on Australian TV!

Let save this and see if the Google Map worked…


View Larger Map” mce_src=”
View Larger Map” alt=”Mansions” border=”" hspace=”" vspace=”" width=”" height=”" align=”left” />

Tags: , , , , , , ,

New media in the 2007 Australian Federal election

January 29th, 2008 by Daniel Young | No Comments | Filed in Politics, Social media

Just got in from a presentation at the Australian Centre for Public Communication, a faculty within the University of Technology Sydney (UTS). Professor Jim Macnamara presented the results of a research report entitled E-Electioneering: Use of New Media in the 2007 Australian Federal Election.

The objectives of the research were to:

  • Capture data on the frequency and type of new media used by Australian Federal politicians, parties, interest groups and activists
  • Provide an analysis of the new media used to identify the range of viewpoints and the level of interactivity and community engagement attempted or achieved

Overall, the level of engagement achieved had been minimal due to the failure of the politicians to use the power of social media to engage and interact. Only one of the 226 politicians studied allowed negative comments to appear on their site (this was Malcolm Turnbull). In all other cases, comments sections were either not available or carried purely fan mail i.e. positive/supportive messages. Very small numbers replied to questions submitted via Websites and social networks, completely missing the opportunity to engage in conversation and drive advocacy.

Some figures:

  • Less than 6% of selected Federal politicians had a new media presence assessed as “fairly interactive” (i.e. involving links inviting people to comment, ask questions or leave messages)
  • 185 elected Federal politicians had new media sites which were completly one-way information dissemination with no opportunity for comment or input by members of the public
  • Web and other sites of 70 elected Federal politicians comprised a single page and were judged to be a ‘token effort’
  • Only three (1.3 per cent) were classified as “very comprehensive”, assessed on the basis of multiple pages plus links to other information such as blogs, podcasts or YouTube. The Kevin07 site was one of the three.
  • Two Websites were judged to be amateurish and the majority were based on templates
  • There were just 15 blogs but on average Federal politicians used 2.24 types of digital media

How not to do it

One of the key conclusions drawn from all of this is that “new media have not created a new public sphere of political discussion and debate where citizens can participate as equals as envisioned by Habermas (1989)”.

I take issue with this conclusion. It’s clear from the data that new media hasn’t been given the chance to create ‘a new public sphere of political discussion’ because it has been poorly applied and executed. In other words, new media hasn’t failed but our politicians and their advisors have. John Howard provides a case in point. He made little or no attempt to adapt his message or presentation for YouTube and opened his maiden YouTube appearance with ‘Good Morning!’.

John Howard bye bye

There was much talk after the presentation about the fact that the majority of people that visited these types of sites where politically active and that it’s not actually these people that influence the outcome of elections.

My colleague, Ed, made a good point after the event. He said that he agreed with this conclusion but that the experience of US pollies had shown that social media could be used effectively as tool for mobilising a community of politically active advocates and supporters i.e. it does have an important role to play/does add value.

I would argued that politicians, in general, need to change the tone of their message and the way it is presented (Infotainment). This would help to engage the politically apathetic and help voters feel that they were interacting with a real person with a personality.

The report touched on the contribution of prosumers or citizens in terms of video commentary and other types of media. Macnamara made the point that much of this content was spoof material and he said that the jury was out as to whether this represented genuine political discourse. I don’t think there should be any question that it does.

My other observation related to the number of times that the audience made a point based on an assumption that only young people use social media.

Overall, it was an informative session in an academic setting and food for thought.

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , ,