Utilitarianism: More votes to clever people
In 1861, the philisopher John Stuart Mill wrote: the exercise of any political function, either as an elector or representative, is power over others.
We live in tumultuous times. The United State Presidential Election is scheduled to take place on November 4 this year.
The question remains relevant today: Do voters have a moral duty to be informed about politics?
The majority of Americans rely on the television for their political information, not realising that most news networks are highly partisan, owned by corporations and biased.
John Stuart Mill argued that the impact of political ignorance should be offset by giving extra votes to the most highly educated portions of the population.
Who is responsible for generating an informed population? Is it the moral responsibility of the individual? Perhaps – It’s rarely (if ever) in the interests of the political elite or governing party to educate the electorate about its shortcomings and failings.
Edmund Burke coined the term, the Fourth Estate. He is quoted in Thomas Carlyle’s book:
“Burke said that there were three Estates in Parliament, but in the Reporters Gallery yonder, there sat a Fourth Estate more important far than they all”.
Journalism is seen as having a critical role to play as an institution that holds the other institutions to account. Sadly, our society has lost faith in the media.
2b or not 2b informed
A Pew Research Centre Study found that 66 per cent of people consider the press “one sided” while only 9 percent of journalists are concerned with the media’s credibility.
Technology is challenging and transforming the Fourth Estate.
The Internet is perceived to have democratised information. It has placed the means of production in the hands of the consumer, hence User Generated Content. It has enabled the audience to engage in conversation, to provide feedback and to challenge one sided arguments and vested interests.
The Internet presents fantastic possibilities and potential as means of sharing information and mobilising communities around a cause or issue but I don’t think its safe to assume that this potential will necesarily be realised to the benefit of all.
I think we can draw parallels between free markets and de-regulation and the impact of the Internet on media and information. Recent events clearly demonstrate – if proof were needed – that a laissez-faire attitude does not always lead to a positive or sustainable outcome. Fundamentally, free markets (of information or finance) may be self correcting but often that process is too painful to bare.
We cannot claim that traditional print media has been effective in establishing an informed population (whatever one of those is) but my fear is that new media, digital media will have a downward effect on the degree to which the community as a whole is achieving an acceptable level of informed-ness.
Contained conversation
Sure, it will expose active and aware audiences to a much wider and active array of content and opinion but that’s an echo chamber. A situation in which information, ideas or beliefs are amplified or reinforced by transmission inside an “enclosed” space. This was one of the primary objections to the role of the media in the lead up to the Iraq War.
History tells us that the general public has no inclination and accepts no moral obligation to be informed about events in the world and in the world of digital media where the reader is the editor this concerns me.
For the majority of the population, the Internet means memes, it means funny videos, it means games, it means shopping, it means entertaining news and opinion. It has little or no relationship with political consciousness.
The following table captures the characteristics of traditional print media as I see them and compares them with that of digital and new media.
My fear is that if we move to a world where the characteristics of the media and the way that we engage with media reside in the right hand collumn we will utlimely become less informed and not more.
I don’t know what the solution is to this problem given the fact that media is moving irretrievably along a digital path but I think it’s worthy of discussion.
Tags: Biden, Burke, Bush, digital, election, Iraq, journalism, McCain, Media, Mill, Obama, palin, PEW, Presidential, social
Tony Blair’s legacy is the Iraq war. That must be disappointing for a self proclaimed socialist who entered into our political consciousness as a fresh faced do gooder with a ‘New’ political agenda. He sounds old, defeated and stubborn these days.
Subscribe Feed (RSS)
