<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Just Another 24 Hours &#187; payments</title>
	<atom:link href="http://justanother24hours.com/tag/payments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://justanother24hours.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 27 Dec 2011 04:27:27 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<cloud domain='justanother24hours.com' port='80' path='/?rsscloud=notify' registerProcedure='' protocol='http-post' />
		<item>
		<title>Readers should fund online media and that includes journalism and blogs</title>
		<link>http://justanother24hours.com/media/readers-should-fund-online-media-and-that-includes-journalism-and-blogs/</link>
		<comments>http://justanother24hours.com/media/readers-should-fund-online-media-and-that-includes-journalism-and-blogs/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Oct 2009 08:04:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Daniel Young</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[funding]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[journalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[micro]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Murdoch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[payments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[quality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[revenue]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://justanother24hours.com/?p=943</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Everyone's asking who or what will fund journalism? Daniel Young at Just Another 24 Hours provides the answer in this post. A sustainable media landscape in the broadest sense of the term requires a sustainable business model and revenue stream. ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: justify;">The business model that underpins print media is under pressure as a result of the competition that is presented by free online media in the form of news sites and blogs. Publishers are grappling with a range of questions:</p>
<ul style="text-align: justify;">
<li>Will digital advertising revenue alone support quality journalism?</li>
<li>Will readers pay for quality content?</li>
<li>Will micro-payments scheme work on a pay as you go basis?</li>
<li>What will happen if I start charging for content but no-one else follows suit?</li>
<li>Can we maintain objectivity within an advertising-only funded revenue model?</li>
</ul>
<p style="text-align: justify;">The Internet has caused massive fragmentation of the media landscape, bloggers and news sites have sprung up that cater for the most niche of audience groups &#8211; this is a good thing. They attract large numbers of readers but few of them are profitable.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">In the medium to long term I believe that the blogosphere will face its own challenges when it comes to funding and sustainability. The net result will be drastic consolidation of the blogosphere, which will have a knock on effect for the niche audiences many of which will lose their &#8216;media&#8217;.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">There is a simple solution to all of this. Every publisher charges a fee.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">Online publishers whether they be <a title="Heritage media laurel papworth" href="http://laurelpapworth.com/heritage-hartigan-attacks-australians/" target="_blank">heritage</a> media publishing houses that have made the transition to web, new media houses or independent bloggers should charge a micro-fee for their content on a pay per use basis.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">Its a win win win situation.</p>
<ul style="text-align: justify;">
<li>Readers are served by quality mainstream media and coverage of niche interests.</li>
<li>Advertising revenue can be devoted to social networks, search, communities, forums, discussions groups and so on.</li>
<li>Journalists and bloggers get to maintain their objectivity as part of a sustainable and value industry.</li>
<li>Journalism is sustainable.</li>
<li>Government, institutions, business, interest groups are held to account by an objective and sustainable Media.</li>
<li>Consumers make informed evolved decisions based on influence and information, as opposed to mindless subliminal advertising.</li>
<li>Media becomes a true marketplace &#8211; quality shines.</li>
</ul>
<p style="text-align: justify;">I recognise that there are practical issues associated with this model but for me this is the true evolution of the Internet. A force that has democratised information and influence. Lets now apply a workable marketplace for the <a title="Influence Economy" href="http://rossdawsonblog.com/weblog/archives/2009/10/futurist_proved.html" target="_blank">influence economy</a>.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;"><em>Thanks for visiting, click here to <a href="http://feedburner.google.com/fb/a/mailverify?uri=JustAnother24Hours-DanielYoung&amp;loc=en_US">Subscribe to Just Another 24 Hours &#8211; Daniel Young by Email</a>.</em></p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">
<p style="text-align: justify;">
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://justanother24hours.com/media/readers-should-fund-online-media-and-that-includes-journalism-and-blogs/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.365 seconds -->

