When social media came into being it generated a significant groundswell of people that believed that it would be a positive thing for society and community.
By forcing businesses to become more transparent and distributing the means of media production it was argued that our society would change for the better.
This point of view probably peaked in 2006/7 but bubbled below the surface for a lot longer than that.
I fully subscribe to this point of view. I still do.
But there are doubts and questions in my mind.
2011 hasn’t done anything to allay my fears.
Since 2008 we’ve seen major abuses of poor by power elites and institutions in almost every sphere of our existence. Yes, these abuses have been exposed but take the global financial crisis as an example and you can see that little has actually changed despite the exposure of the wrong doers.
Over the last few weeks, we’ve seen the Occupy movement spring up but I don’t believe that any Government is actually really listening. Yes, they have a voice. Yes, they’ve gained some media coverage for their struggle and point of view but to what end. Will anything really change? The strong arm tactics employed by the police in the UK, Australia and USA would suggest that the traditional institutions still have the right to operate in the way that they see fit.
Taking a slight tangent here the one thing that really concerns me is this.
The companies that are really benefiting from social media are not complying or furthering the principles of openness and transparency upon which their industry is supposedly based. Companies like Google and Facebook are in fact operating in very shady and opaque ways when it comes to managing information and data.
What hope is there for greater transparency in society when the companies at the forefront of social media are acting in this way?
Marx argued that religion is the opiate of the people. Will social media one day assume this moniker?
Tags: change, facebook, Google, occupy, ows, socialmedia, society, transparency
