<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Just Another 24 Hours &#187; Zuckerberg</title>
	<atom:link href="http://justanother24hours.com/tag/zuckerberg/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://justanother24hours.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 24 Mar 2012 03:45:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<cloud domain='justanother24hours.com' port='80' path='/?rsscloud=notify' registerProcedure='' protocol='http-post' />
		<item>
		<title>The Facebook Irony: Recent Facebook outrage and privacy debate doesn&#8217;t ring true</title>
		<link>http://justanother24hours.com/social-media/the-facebook-irony-recent-facebook-outrage-and-privacy-debate-doesnt-ring-true/</link>
		<comments>http://justanother24hours.com/social-media/the-facebook-irony-recent-facebook-outrage-and-privacy-debate-doesnt-ring-true/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Jun 2010 05:37:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Daniel Young</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Social media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[data]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[facebook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[information]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[irony]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Likes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SocialNetworks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[User]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Zuckerberg]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://justanother24hours.com/?p=1161</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Facebook privacy issues and attacks on Mark Zuckerberg are ironic given the fact that user data and member information supports the business model of Facebook and other social networks]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: justify;"><img class="alignleft size-thumbnail wp-image-1163" style="border: 2px solid black; margin-left: 10px; margin-right: 10px;" title="shocked-woman_aa039975" src="http://justanother24hours.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/06/shocked-woman_aa039975-169x169-custom.jpg" alt="shocked-woman_aa039975" width="169" height="169" />On the topic of recent Facebook &#8216;outrage&#8217; around privacy issues.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">A significant section of the media/Web commentariat has expressed its dis-satisfiaction with Facebook&#8217;s policies and management. I can&#8217;t help noticing the irony here.<span id="more-1161"></span></p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">Individuals who have built businesses and reputations on the basis of  the models that  underpin social media and digital advertising are now outraged at the fact that  Facebook wants to make money from user data.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">Really?</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">These people have the right to express a view, and Facebook has not managed its stakeholders well.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">But&#8230;</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">The issue here is that Facebook wants to access, use and profit from information about its members.  Shock! Horror!</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">The opportunity to do both of these things is why Facebook and other services like it exist in the first place!</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">Many seem to think that Mark Zuckerberg provides Facebook as a service out of the goodness of his heart. This sense of entitlement makes us the &#8216;dumb f*cks&#8217;.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;"><img class="size-thumbnail  wp-image-1162 alignright" style="border: 1px solid black;  margin-left: 10px;  margin-right: 10px;" title="mark-zuckerberg1" src="http://justanother24hours.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/06/mark-zuckerberg1-150x150.jpg" alt="mark-zuckerberg1" width="150" height="150" /></p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">Others seem to think that they can re-define the terms of their usage after they agreed to an End User License Agreement, which handed control of their content and data to Facebook.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">User data underpins the business model.  What was once considered private information will become more public.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">You have a choice.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://justanother24hours.com/social-media/the-facebook-irony-recent-facebook-outrage-and-privacy-debate-doesnt-ring-true/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>One in Four Prefer the Old Facebook</title>
		<link>http://justanother24hours.com/social-media/one-in-four-prefer-the-old-facebook/</link>
		<comments>http://justanother24hours.com/social-media/one-in-four-prefer-the-old-facebook/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Sep 2008 04:22:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Daniel Young</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Social media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[design]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[facebook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[myspace]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social networks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Zuckerberg]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://justanother24hours.com/?p=214</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[What do you think of the new Facebook design? 
My first impression of the new new design was that it felt more like an enterprise application. I think the tabs have added a sense &#8211; imagined or real &#8211; of complexity. 
I don&#8217;t understand the justification from moving from the one profile page to the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What do you think of the new Facebook design? </p>
<p>My first impression of the new new design was that it felt more like an enterprise application. I think the tabs have added a sense &#8211; imagined or real &#8211; of complexity. </p>
<p>I don&#8217;t understand the justification from moving from the one profile page to the tabbed format. A service which made a huge amount of information and interaction readily available has become much more cumbersome to use. </p>
<p>With the old version, you didn&#8217;t know what was new, but by scrolling down the page &#8211; the new content was <em>revealed</em> to you. Now users must click on tabs and literally <em>find </em>content and updates &#8211; it&#8217;s much less fun and much more effort.</p>
<p>Facebook <a href="http://blog.new.facebook.com/blog.php?post=31033537130">won&#8217;t </a>be supporting the two versions, unlike Yahoo!, for example, which continues to support &#8216;Classic&#8217; and &#8216;New&#8217; Yahoo! Mail. This is despite the fact that 1 in  4 users prefer the old design (<a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/technology/7609555.stm">Facebook data</a>). </p>
<p>The <a href="http://www.insidefacebook.com/2008/09/22/mainstream-press-coverage-of-facebook-redesign/">Inside Facebook blog </a>is a great source of info on &#8211; you guessed it &#8211; Facebook. </p>
<p>People have an emotional connection with Facebook and they tend to be resistant to change in general so it&#8217;s inevitable that there would be a kick back to the re-design. </p>
<p>This Facebook group <a href="http://www.new.facebook.com/group.php?sid=6896150e3267b409c057fccb94b59349&#038;refurl=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.new.facebook.com%2Fs.php%3Fsid%3D6896150e3267b409c057fccb94b59349%26q%3Dfacebook%2Bdesign%2Bgroup%26init%3Dq%26n%3D-1%26o%3D4%26s%3D10%26sf%3Dp&#038;gid=21213297178">&#8216;1 000 000+ to bring back old facebook&#8217;</a> has 369,810 members. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://justanother24hours.com/social-media/one-in-four-prefer-the-old-facebook/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.312 seconds -->

